On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:44 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:33 PM, David Knezevic < > david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote: > >> The latest version of PETSc is 3.6.1 and the latest version of SLEPc is >> 3.6.0. When I try to configure libMesh with SLEPc enabled with these >> versions, I get this message: >> <<< Different version numbers for SLEPc and PETSc >>> >> and SLEPc is disabled. >> >> Do we require the minor version numbers of PETSc and SLEPc to match? That >> seems unnecessary, no? >> > > We do require it, but should probably weaken the test to at least > major/minor version matching... > Yeah, I agree, I don't think we need to check the subminor, since that's just related to patches. I see that we define "petscmajorminor=$petscmajor.$petscminor.x" in petsc.m4, so I think we should do the same in slepc.m4, and change the version number check to: if (test $slepcmajorminor != $petscmajorminor) Do you agree? If so, I can push that. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
