On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, David Knezevic <david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:44 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:33 PM, David Knezevic < >> david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote: >> >>> The latest version of PETSc is 3.6.1 and the latest version of SLEPc is >>> 3.6.0. When I try to configure libMesh with SLEPc enabled with these >>> versions, I get this message: >>> <<< Different version numbers for SLEPc and PETSc >>> >>> and SLEPc is disabled. >>> >>> Do we require the minor version numbers of PETSc and SLEPc to match? That >>> seems unnecessary, no? >>> >> >> We do require it, but should probably weaken the test to at least >> major/minor version matching... >> > > > Yeah, I agree, I don't think we need to check the subminor, since that's > just related to patches. > > I see that we define "petscmajorminor=$petscmajor.$petscminor.x" in > petsc.m4, so I think we should do the same in slepc.m4, and change the > version number check to: > > if (test $slepcmajorminor != $petscmajorminor) > > Do you agree? If so, I can push that. > Yep, sounds good. Assuming that PETSc 3.6.1 does actually work with SLEPc 3.6.0 for you ;-) -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
