On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org> wrote:
> David Knezevic <david.kneze...@akselos.com> writes: > > Do we require the minor version numbers of PETSc and SLEPc to match? That > > seems unnecessary, no? > > The subminor version does not have to match because PETSc (since 3.4) > promises to maintain source and binary compatibility. > OK, thanks. John pointed out that this was just a warning anyway. The actual error I was encountering was due to another issue (fixed in John's latest PR, which is now merged). But we might want to remove the warning too, since it could just lead to confusion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
