At 09:31 2/3/01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >And you can start it at any time - as a revolution. When it's ready, if
>> >you get enough votes you can even call it tomcat.
>>
>> Ahh but what if I don't want to. Library is not an Avalon revolution - it
>> seems it will end up as a top level project. So I want Glom to be a
>> top-level project - any objections ? Glom should sit side by side tomcat as
>> obviously tomcat as failed (if it hadn't I wouldn't have built Glom - now
>> would I?).
>
>I hope Craig will agree a third time when I say we are better with
>separate CVS trees for tomcat3.x and catalina.
Again you seem to be deliberately avoiding the point. Separate CVS trees
are fine. Avalon has 5 plus one proposal sub-tree. Now would it be in the
best interests of jakarta if both catalina and tomcat were separate
top-level projects. ie They separate mailing lists/separate
committers/separate web pages.
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
