Re: Riffing again on another tangent

[Ted Husted]

"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> Because, (in my head),  as Agora would be organizationally a peer to all
> other 'productized compoenents', all Agora must do is stick to it's
> charter (open incubator) and it is free to do that in any way the
> committers of the Agora project see fit.  Since it seems that the plan
> is that every Jakarta committer would be an Agora committer, anything
> could, would and should happen.

I'm not sure what you're saying here, but let's just keep the sandbox as
an adjunct to the Commons. If it really works that well, someone can
always propose that it be convert to its own "Agora" subproject. 


"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> Further, I was trying to clarify how that could be encoded into the
> charter of this project - each subproject in the library is an
> independant project a la Jakarta, with a separate set of committers, so
> there can be no cross project influenece or interferance.

If you go there, then we should just start proposing packages as Jakarta
subprojects. 

-T.