Ted Husted wrote:
>
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> > Ah! That is why I am confused - didn't we *agree* to this with 4 +1's,
> > and three listed there with a comment?
>
> If you read the comments, you'll see that Morgan, Rodney, and I
> suggested the taglibs model. Later, Costin and Ignacio also went for
> that.
>
> Please, if you don't agree, just call for a vote with the specific
> language you favor.
I am not sure that would really be productive, as the language I favor
is orthogonal to the 'committer mob' model. What I was hoping for is
very, very simple : a Jakarta project that hosts mini-projects, to allow
the productization of components useful for building server solutions in
Java. Same Jakarta rules. Same Jakarta charter.
If it's clear that the majority of the people who are going to be
involved from the get-go want another taglibs, then taglibs it should
be, I suppose.
I think I tried and tried and tried to get my point across, and I was
very unsuccessful.
I think that the view I have of this is different enough that I should
drop it from this discussion.
Maybe I should propose *that* for a vote :
Subject : [VOTE] Geir shuts up about his damn mini-Jakarta model
:)
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
