On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:28:44 John Sullivan wrote: > drew Roberts <[email protected]> writes: > > I think rather, that for the safety of the user (remember, these days > > they are pushing to put people in jail for simple possession of > > copyright infringing material) it would be better to label the album > > with the most restrictive license and perhaps * (star) it to indicate > > that the album contains some Free tracks. > > That isn't your/our decision to make -- as Donald said, the license of > the album is a factual question, the answer to which is determined only > by the copyright holder(s). Tagging it with an arbitrary license just > because that is the license of one of the tracks on the album is > incorrect and doesn't help anyone's safety.
Since an album is actually a collection of tracks, wouldn't it be wise to indicate, in the album view, the licenses of the tracks? (eg: if all tracks are CC-BY, say the album has CC-BY tracks; if one track is PD and the others CC-BY then say the album has "PD; CC-BY" tracks) Best regards, -- Marcos Marado _______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
