Hi Luiz,

Thanks for all the info.

@librecmc-team:

I've just yet reflashed the router and I'm amazed by the quality,
usability, and powerful features of the firmware.

I did never run OpenWRT firmware so I can't compare, but if this is what
freedom feels like, I'm definitely sold!

Flashing was easy as can be, although the OpenWRT guides did help me for
the basic understanding. Now I'll be the guinea pig for a little while
and then start supplying some of these setups to friends.

You can expect some donations from me in the future, in bitcoin or in
development effort.

for all the work you put into this.

Regards,
Nico

On ma, 2015-11-30 at 20:21 -0300, Luiz Franco wrote:
> Dear Nico
> 
> Am I correct to select LibreCMC for this router? Can I reasonably
> expect
> this router to be supported in the future within the project, or does
> it
> have some red flags going for it?
> 
> 
> Answer: I have flashed librecmc v1.3.2 3 month ago, and until know i
> had no problem with it. my wdr4300 is version 1.7 and i downloaded
> from http://downloads.librecmc.org/snapshots/v1.3.2/ar71xx/; i
> downloaded generic and luci versions, but i flashed the luci version
> only. I have another router from TP-LINK( wr2543nd ) and i flashed
> librecmc 1.3.2 too, it worked too, but i did not tested the router
> fully. In my opinion you should try if you want total freedom,
> download the firmware builded and have a try.
> 
> And secondly, would I have to build a custom version of LibreCMC to
> run
> on the WDR4300, or could I just use say the image of the WR1043ND?
> 
> 
> Answer: No, you can download from:
> http://downloads.librecmc.org/snapshots/v1.3.2/ar71xx/ ( this link is
> for wdr4300, wr2543nd and others ). You should download v1.3.2 if you
> want.
> 
> 
> And lastly, do recommended models like the WR1043ND have some positive
> points going for it with respect to the WDR4300? I have seen one a
> couple of weeks ago in the second-hand circuit, but it seems to be
> quite
> rare, thus resulting in a long duration to source 6 more routers.
> 
> 
> Answer: I recommend: wdr4300 and wr2543nd because i have both, i
> flashed librecmc v1.3.2 on both, and i can confirm router aparently
> works normal, i dont tested these routers fully, but it is working.
> Note that FAILSAFE works on both.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Luiz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Este e-mail foi enviado por um
> computador sem vĂ­rus e protegido
> pelo Avast. 
> www.avast.com 
> 
> 2015-11-30 18:46 GMT-03:00 Nico Rikken <n...@nicorikken.eu>:
>         Dear Luiz and Robert,
>         
>         Based on your emails on this list during the last couple of
>         months, I've
>         ordered a TP-Link WDR4300. I know it is not officially
>         supported by
>         LibreCMC, but I would prefer LibreCMC over OpenWRT, if only
>         for
>         contributors sharing similar ideals.
>         
>         I mainly selected it as ordering totally freedom respecting
>         routers from
>         ThinkPenguin is an expensive hobby from out of the
>         Netherlands, and
>         sourcing similar hardware is hard (second-hand). The WDR4300
>         is full of
>         features, and is available via multiple distributors. The
>         latter is
>         important because I have requests lined up for 6 more routers
>         for
>         freedom-loving friends.
>         
>         Am I correct to select LibreCMC for this router? Can I
>         reasonably expect
>         this router to be supported in the future within the project,
>         or does it
>         have some red flags going for it?
>         
>         And secondly, would I have to build a custom version of
>         LibreCMC to run
>         on the WDR4300, or could I just use say the image of the
>         WR1043ND?
>         
>         And lastly, do recommended models like the WR1043ND have some
>         positive
>         points going for it with respect to the WDR4300? I have seen
>         one a
>         couple of weeks ago in the second-hand circuit, but it seems
>         to be quite
>         rare, thus resulting in a long duration to source 6 more
>         routers.
>         
>         Sorry for having wasted valuable time, but I hope I can learn
>         from it,
>         and others on this list as well.
>         
>         Kind regards,
>         Nico Rikken (NL)
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Librecmc-dev mailing list
Librecmc-dev@lists.librecmc.org
https://librecmc.org/mailman/listinfo/librecmc-dev

Reply via email to