https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167145
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) > It is. Providing such an option, we provide an option to create unstable > documents. You mean, like plain markdown (bug 160734), HTML, RTF, and other formats we support saving to? > These file formats are self-contained in their own right. E.g., a TXT > contains only a text stream, and has no idea about pages and footnotes. And if I save to a text file, that means I don't want to retain information about pages and footnotes. > But > all ODF formats do have all the concepts that you suggest to eliminate; and > that means, that the documents that inherently rely on some data, miss that > data. On the contrary. Much of the time, it is arbitrary data that LibreOffice forces into files, which the users did not want nor intend to place in it. Additionally, if this is information that documents "inherently rely on", it would not be stored as application settings, but as aspects of the content or the styles. Not to mention the fact, that application configuration is, by definition, application-specific. Open your ODTs in another application, and they would often/typically be ignored. > Your request is WONTFIX of INVALID; but you again started an edit war. It doesn't work that way. My request is UNCONFIRMED; you mistakenly marked it as WONTFIX, without justifying such an action. And - an edit is not an edit war. > I > don't resolve it myself now, but I suggest you to consider that yourself, > and create separate tickets; and if needed, a META ticket, which could > potentially be a base for "create a dedicated page with an option to disable > *those specific items* all at once". I am not focusing on individual settings, this bug requests the option of not saving application settings at all. I have, however, pre-split the matter of application settings and view settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
