https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164001
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #5) > but selecting is selecting and activating is activating. Yes, exactly: And when the user clicks a slide - whether they're adding it to a selection or just creating a single-slide selection (no-shift clicking) - they expect to see it. > The slide pane can also > be enlarged to help with slide content observation. This is at most a matter > of taste. Or why in particular would this make sense other than what I said? I didn't understand your last two sentences. How does slide pane enlargement relate to slide clicking > Not saying we should always strive to emulate others, but office.com's > Powerpoint behaves the same way as Impress. Are you sure? This clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlHaM4cILP0 suggests otherwise (although it uses Ctrl+Click, not Shift+Click). > > I would also argue that keeping the current behaviour would preserve a > feeling of robustness - as the convention for selecting in programs is to > not have side-effects, it can feel disturbing to see sudden other changes > occur. So it would violate a kind of ideal of calm UI. No-Shift clicking shows the slide, so it's robust/consistent for with-Shift clicking to show the slide. So, if showing the slide is "not calm" - we should be consistently uncalm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
