https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172951
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsUXEval See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |https://bugs.documentfounda |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17 |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17 |1252, |1259 |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81 | |829, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 | |5776 | Blocks| |86899 CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org, | |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- +1 We just cleaned up the single page view movements for bug 171259 at 26.8.0, but I can see some utility to adding new UNO to support book view page movements by page pairs (or alteratively of modifying .uno:GoToStartOfNextPage / .uno:GoToStartOfPrevPage to *also* be view aware and test for Book-view). A user choosing 2-up "Book-view" likely does not want to page in single page increments. While default single-page, or the multi-page (as-zoom'd) should keep the single page movements. @Jim, reasonable? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86899 [Bug 86899] [META] Requests for the addition of UNO commands -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
