https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79466
--- Comment #11 from m.a.riosv <[email protected]> --- Hi Michael, thanks for the intervention. I don't see too much understanding from their side, but hope the fire is off. Best regards. Miguel Ángel. El 31/05/14 18:25, [email protected] escribió: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79466 > > Michael Meeks <[email protected]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Severity|normal |enhancement > CC| |[email protected] > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #6 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> --- > pb: I'm amused at your political slur; particularly while recommending not > talking to eg. the UX guys to build consensus, but just doing it unilaterally > ! > =) > > Either way - personally I'd like the k/b shortcuts to be as configurable and > familiar to people as possible. That raises some significant challenges with > the existing menus - as you outline below. I like both your ideas for > multi-key > shortcuts [ we want to get those emacs users included ], and/or configuring > menu shortcuts [ I imagine that could already be done by disabling / renaming > / > adding menu items with the shortcut you want ? ]. > > Anyhow - patches that meet the needs of both existing, and new users [ ie. > don't just tweak the shortcuts ;-] gratefully received - we're never short of > good ideas for things to work on; only of people to put in the hard work to > make them happen. > > m.a.riosv: thanks for the reason & sanity you bring =) > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
