https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79466
--- Comment #12 from pb <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #11) In view of the continuing hostility, I retract my offer to look at the code. > Hi Michael, > thanks for the intervention. > I don't see too much understanding from their side, but hope the fire is > off. > > Best regards. > Miguel Ángel. > > > El 31/05/14 18:25, [email protected] escribió: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79466 > > > > Michael Meeks <[email protected]> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > > Severity|normal |enhancement > > CC| > > |[email protected] > > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > > > --- Comment #6 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> --- > > pb: I'm amused at your political slur; particularly while recommending not > > talking to eg. the UX guys to build consensus, but just doing it > > unilaterally ! > > =) > > > > Either way - personally I'd like the k/b shortcuts to be as configurable and > > familiar to people as possible. That raises some significant challenges with > > the existing menus - as you outline below. I like both your ideas for > > multi-key > > shortcuts [ we want to get those emacs users included ], and/or configuring > > menu shortcuts [ I imagine that could already be done by disabling / > > renaming / > > adding menu items with the shortcut you want ? ]. > > > > Anyhow - patches that meet the needs of both existing, and new users [ ie. > > don't just tweak the shortcuts ;-] gratefully received - we're never short > > of > > good ideas for things to work on; only of people to put in the hard work to > > make them happen. > > > > m.a.riosv: thanks for the reason & sanity you bring =) > > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
