https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85614
--- Comment #16 from Michael Meeks <[email protected]> --- > I don't follow your logic. The rules clearly state that the "only allowed > features [are those] approved by the ESC". I havn't read it - it seems a shaky fragment of a wiki page to build an argument on; but last I looked: tripple reviewed features by a plurality of entities are allowed at any time without explicit approval. But that's all moot - this was a bug fix; with a chunk of work done to fix a bug that was filed. > So again by the rules, a bug fix is allowed. And, how is reminding people > of the rules is inflammatory? Your attitude & approach here is highly counter-productive. This was a bug fix, done in someone's spare time, against a backdrop of aggressive feedback - there being so much of it on every side, that it is hard to tell who is right vs. wrong, what is urgent vs. not and so on. > Instead of focusing on whether this is a fix or feature, we should be > working to ensure that it goes live as soon as possible. So - the bug is resolved WONTFIX for 4.2.x - the real problem seems to be that 4.3.x apparently also ships (apparently) in the unexpected configuration - right ? we could of course ship a new build of that live branch more quickly *but* there are still vague, unclear claims that the fixed version of 4.3.x has (unspecified) problems with it still. IIWY I'd focus on that issue, and crisping up exactly what (if anything) remains as an issue there - that is useful work for 4.3 / 4.4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
