https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103955
--- Comment #12 from Ilario Gottardello <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #11)
> In light of this, it is evident that the .dot files would need to be edited
> in the same Microsoft Office version as they were produced in. I simply
> cannot produce reliable anonymized versions of them.
But are the dot files really necessary? I thought the real problem was that the
doc files are not interpreted correctly
> Furthermore, the .dot is a binary format and obsolete. It is questionable,
> if we should sacrifice resources to support it.
Well, the standard version of office at my workplace is Office 2007
It could surely be helpful to split the bug report in various bug reports, one
for each problem, and if you tell me how you prefer, I will do it.
I will already be very happy if Writer will be able to open the doc files
correctly!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
