https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103955
--- Comment #13 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Ilario Gottardello from comment #12)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #11)
> > In light of this, it is evident that the .dot files would need to be edited
> > in the same Microsoft Office version as they were produced in. I simply
> > cannot produce reliable anonymized versions of them.
> But are the dot files really necessary? I thought the real problem was that
> the doc files are not interpreted correctly
>
> > Furthermore, the .dot is a binary format and obsolete. It is questionable,
> > if we should sacrifice resources to support it.
> Well, the standard version of office at my workplace is Office 2007
>
> It could surely be helpful to split the bug report in various bug reports,
> one for each problem, and if you tell me how you prefer, I will do it.
>
> I will already be very happy if Writer will be able to open the doc files
> correctly!
I understood that the doc/docx/odt files were created by opening the .dot file
in LibreOffice. The original title of your report was "Difficulty importing
office templates".
If you now want to change this to be about opening non-template files produced
by Microsoft Office, I think it would be better to close this and open new
reports (so many comments already etc.).
In the new reports, be sure to mention "This file was created with Microsoft
Office 2007" etc. so there is no need to add comments requesting information.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
