https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131487
--- Comment #23 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Callegar from comment #22) > @Mike Kagansky What I am trying to communicate, with a sadly negative > outcome, is that the number of false negatives with the proposed approach > should be way less than the number of false negatives without it. I understand that. But you confuse "the number of false negatives for myself" vs "the number of false negatives universally". The overall number of users who may use cases that you describe is way less than the number of users who do *not* intentionally use such things, but may create such combinations accidentally (e.g., fast typers who switch keyboard layout too fast, and start a word starting from letter "c" - which curiously in English layout co-incides with Russian "с" having exactly the same shape, and thus indistinguishable in shape; or even more combinations in Roman languages). So if 10 million users do such mistakes once every 10 years, and you and other 10 users experience your describer problem 10 times a day, the failure rate would be 2740:100. I took very low rate of failures for 10 million users, and very high rate for problem that you describe; but the user number at both sides are arbitrary, since I don't have numbers at hand (but I do know how often such typos happen e.g. for myself - being Russian - and for my colleagues at previous job - that's definitely not once 10 years). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
