https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151359
--- Comment #13 from Eike Rathke <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #11) > if we're not using this field for anything, perhaps we can just remove it > entirely The field needs to be present (or we change the DTD), but we could use <DefaultName>you know what</DefaultName> So far I always regarded it as a kind of comment that is preserved by all XML processing.. maybe making it optional and just removing it in zh_TW.xml would indeed be best. (In reply to Kevin Suo from comment #8) > Another solution for this would be renaming the tag to the following for all > locales: > <CountryOrRegion> > <CountryOrRegionID>TW</CountryOrRegionID> > <DefaultName>Taiwan</DefaultName> > </CountryOrRegionID> No, because it is not a region ID, it is solely the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code. Everything else per convention goes into the qlt local-use language tag in the Language field with its full BCP 47 tag in the Variant field. > Or, simply the following per BCP 47: > <Region> > <RegionID>TW</RegionID> > <DefaultName>Taiwan</DefaultName> > </RegionID> Similar no. > Per RFC 5646 BCP 47, for "zh-TW", the tag "zh" is language and the tag "TW" > is region. “Region subtags are used to indicate linguistic variations > associated with or appropriate to a specific country, territory, or > region.”, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5646.html#section-2.2.4. And that encompasses much more than ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country codes, to which the field needs to be restricted for Java compatibility if the LC_INFO element's IDs are stuffed into a css:lang::Locale. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
