Hi!
Here an older mail...
It was not sent to the list, only to Rainer...
I skipped everything, but my schema...
Am 07.06.2012 15:01, schrieb Florian Reisinger:
Hi there!
[...]
[Second schema]
3.6.0.00x for alphas
3.6.0.0x0 for betas
3.6.0.100 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.200 for release(example)
I would skip the zeros at the end:
3.6.0.00x for alphas
3.6.0.0x for betas
3.6.0.1 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.2 for RC (example) and/or release
3.6.0.2 for release (example)
What about:
3.6.0a1 for Alpha 1
3.6.0b3 for Beta 3
// We could simplify the alpha and beta to e.g. 3.6b1 Problem: IMHO
not that easy sortable...
*3.6.4r3* for the release (or rc) of 3.6.4 *fourth* candidate) --> In
most of the cases X.Y.Zr1 would be the published version!!
[...]
--
Bye! | Tschüss!
Florian Reisinger
@Windows 7 x64 SP1
-
Skype: reisi.007
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
