Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 08:20 -0800: > Hi all > > Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming > scheme is useless for QA people. > > (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...) > > At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn* > mentioned a better solution > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-td3556898i20.html#a3567211
I think there were some improvements. We have the new versioning scheme for official builds and use only one git id. > One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no > way to know if build > Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3) > was installed from > master~2012-11-26_00.29.34_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi > or from which Tinderbox it came from. > > Any chance of improving this? Yup, it makes perfect sense. Could you please report a bug? The easiest solution would be to pass the tinderbox credentials via a configure option. I think that it might even be an easy hack. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
