Hi Petr

Petr Mladek wrote
> I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe
> I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux
> tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox
> maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I
> tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not
> test the full build cycle :-)

Oddly enough it shows the new dialog on a build from tinderbox@7 compiled
with MinGW

Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 5da8bdb4d4bde5175c9e89182956043ffc991c5)
TinderBox: Win-x86@7-MinGW, Branch:master, Time: 2012-12-04_09:56:47

but not on tinderbox @6 compiled with MSVC
Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 76c921de48ee41716b5a500b892945c704da73c)

which was pulled more than one day later...
libreoffice-4-0~2012-12-05_16.32.06_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US

Is this a compiler error?

Cheers;
Pedro



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4022791.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to