Hi All, I want to thank those who visited the wiki and contributed to it. I wanted to let everyone know that i have finished including all the ones that i use on a regular basis. :D
Regards, Jay Philips On 08/20/2014 11:02 PM, Jay Philips wrote: > Hi All, > > Yes similar to what joel stated, i'm just posting the ones i use on the > wiki for others to use if they'd like and for those who have their own > and would like to share them, that they'd have a centralized resource to > post them to. I believe the wiki will also be a useful resource for new > QA members to see what type of responses they are likely to have to > respond with. > > I personally use my browser's (opera) inbuilt feature to save these > responses and whiteboard keywords so i dont have to copy and paste them > from a wiki page or text file. Hopefully something similar can be added > into the new bugzilla for QA/dev team members can easily have access to > as Bjoern suggested or until then, grabbing a browser extension which > has a similar feature like JBF suggested. For all those chrome/chromium > users, search the extension for clip or clipboard and there are quite a > few of them listed there. > > Regards, > Jay Philips > > On 08/20/2014 06:38 PM, Joel Madero wrote: >> >> Hey there, >> >>> Jay, *, >>> >>> Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the >>> best interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to >>> dig them out of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, >>> nor improve the readability of issues over their life span. >>> >>> Otherwise, during triage we should all strive to be courteous. By >>> itself, the automated message delivered "*** This bug has been >>> marked as a duplicate of bug xxxxx ***" is a bit too terse in closing >>> a NEW issue as duplicate. But believe including a simple "thank you" >>> for posting would suffice. >>> >>> If too many bugs like fdo#82701 are making it through, then the >>> Bugzilla and BSA "duplicate" issue filters may need to be improved. >> >> I don't think he was trying to codify - maybe more just saying "I'm >> posting these to the wiki - feel free to use (or not use) them at your >> pleasure :) I've thought of doing similar things with my auto responses >> but of course everyone can use their own methodology :) >> >> >> Best, >> Joel >> _______________________________________________ >> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list >> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org >> Change settings: >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa >> Problems? >> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ > _______________________________________________ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ > _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/