Hi Joel, thanks for answering!
Joel Madero wrote on 11-05-15 17:13: > On 04/30/2015 12:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >> .. >> Now this type of issue is stuck in the needsDevEval sink hole. >> So maybe just a different easyHack category? > Well - I'm not a huge fan of yet another sink hole category. How would > it help the situation if it was still just a signal that there is a need > for a code pointer (even if simple) ? Ah no, that is not what I meant. When there is a simple code pointer (I could do that, time given..) such issues can be marked EasyHack Category:Help or somesuch. So that devs don't get bothered with it. Does that make sense? Ciao, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
