Hey Cor! On 05/12/2015 01:56 PM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Joel, > > thanks for answering! > > Joel Madero wrote on 11-05-15 17:13: >> On 04/30/2015 12:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >>> .. >>> Now this type of issue is stuck in the needsDevEval sink hole. >>> So maybe just a different easyHack category? >> Well - I'm not a huge fan of yet another sink hole category. How would >> it help the situation if it was still just a signal that there is a need >> for a code pointer (even if simple) ? > Ah no, that is not what I meant. > When there is a simple code pointer (I could do that, time given..) such > issues can be marked EasyHack Category:Help or somesuch. > So that devs don't get bothered with it. > > Does that make sense? Sure - I see no issue (although let's avoid multi-word, camelCase is the standard). Perhaps easyHackHelp)?
But how about you just start marking them, others will follow your lead :) Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
