On 12/01/2015 03:19 PM, Pedro wrote: > jmadero wrote >> On 12/01/2015 09:03 AM, Sophie wrote: >>> What he was trying to find imho is a compromise between what is needed >>> for QA and for users. Of course, the more granularity the better, but I >>> think also that a long list of version is confusing. > I think the problem here is that a compromise is not possible. > > It is absurd that the version list has 115 items !!! > > LibreOffice_versions.ods > <http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4168006/LibreOffice_versions.ods> > > > LibreOffice/TDF absolutely needs a user friendly Bug Submission Assistant > where users can report bugs they found in the stable releases of the live > branches (currently 4.4, 5.0 and 5.1). This would reduce the list to less > than 15 options... So . . . I think this is a completely separate issue and one that perhaps we can discuss tendering something....if I worked with you on this front could you compromise and agree that bugzilla can stay as is with current policies in place?
Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
