Hi Kohei,

On Mon, 23 May 2011 10:08:38 -0400
Kohei Yoshida <kyosh...@novell.com> wrote:

> Because that's what we decided to do during our TSC meeting IIRC.  The
> premise was that we would do merge regularly into master, ~at least
> once per week as we did during the 3.3 release.  But for some reason
> we haven't merged stuff into master for months for the 3.4 release,
> which was not expected.  I even did merge of the calc repo alone
> because of the huge delay.

Well, my understanding was that the merge from release to master is
just a safety measure to make sure we are not missing something. It
should be a NoOp most of the time. Maybe I got that wrong. Work
should still be done on the most unstable branch IMHO and tickle down to
the more stable ones (under reviews, which might be suspended in the
beginning). Keep in mind this not only about dev-time (as in this case),
but also people are filing bugs against master, verifying them etc.

Best,

Bjoern

-- 
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen


_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to