On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: >> Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings: > > Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding > what versions of what underlying infrastructure to support and/or when > to axe it. > > It sounds like 3.5 is a good place to make a platform cut for some of > this stuff to make our lives easier. > > I'd love an ack from Norbert / Christian - to make a final decision, or > if it is truly controversial we can discuss it at the TSC meeting next > week.
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?spider=1&qprid=10 show that the ratio of Mac OS 10.4 vs Mac OS in general is about 6% down from 12.5% a year ago. With 3.4 keeping support for 10.4, and at the current rate of attrition of the 10.4 installed based, I think that the 3.4 life-cycle will be enough to cater for that demographic so: Ack for bumping minimum requirement to 10.5 Caveat: Like tml_ I don't consider myself a 'Mac' developer... just a Dev that happen to own a Mac. That being said, Christian is the person that need convincing. Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
