Hi Tor, *, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Tor Lillqvist <tlillqv...@novell.com> wrote: >> I just find that "drop it because it is old" is not enough reason to >> drop 10.4 support. > > Yeah, I see your point. > > I guess a good enough reason to drop it would be this hypothetical (but, I > guess, quite possible) situation, or something similar: Some volunteer wants > to contribute code that makes LibreOffice integrate nicely with Lion's > document versioning etc. Using those features requires compiling with the > compiler from Xcode 4(.1) (even if one would look up and use the API in > question dynamically), thanks to the use of blocks > (http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Blocks/Articles/00_Introduction.html > ) or whatever, and that compiler is not capable of compiling against the > 10.4 SDK. And mixing compilers wouldn't work either.
Yes, that would be a reason, but that also has a drawback - using blocks requires 10.6 at least, so I don't think how likely this is. You'll in effect drop 10.5 as well as 10.4 at the same time basically. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
