On 2/23/2018 6:22 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:08:24PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann
> <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I think this was a decision from Norbert, probably because he was worried
>>> about false negatives. A workaround is to watch your inbox (which gets a
>>> mail, whatever is the outcome), rather than the above URL.
>> Except, you never get a mail about Jenkins success/failure if it wasn't you
>> who sent the patch set to Gerrit.
> Cloph, do you have a view on this? Could we have Jenkins set Verified-1
> on the change if the build fails to have a clear separation between "not
> yet verified" and "verified but failed" states, immediately visible from
> the dashboard?
IIRC, that was about "minimal possible negative mark is only possible to
be removed by one who had set it" thing...
LibreOffice mailing list