On 02/12/12 20:38, Gustavo C. M. wrote: > Just an exercise of making distinctions: > >> For example, the owner of an "Internet Cafe" could offer the use of >> Free Software on machines that the users do not own. >> Since the software is not being distributed, the GNU GPL does not come >> into effect. > > It comes; it's just that it's "propagation", not "conveying", of a > "covered work".
Stop. If only there was a FAQ on the GPL: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html I would say the Internet Cafe would be similar to the "Laptop Loan" (but this is not legal advice and I am not a lawyer): http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LaptopLoan There is also an explanation of the terms propagate and convey: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyPropagateAndConvey If you do come up with one or more questions (preferably with answers) then could you try to get the FSF to add them to this FAQ (or another FAQ). Carry on. :) Regards, Mike. -- FSF member #9429 http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=9429 http://www.fsf.org/about "The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom and to defend the rights of all free software users."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
