"Quiliro Ordóñez" <[email protected]> escribió: >El 15/05/13 10:16, Will Rico escribió: >> GNU and FSF promote the use of CC By-ND, so at least by their >> definition, this license can be considered "free" under the >> appropriate circumstances: >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses >> > >Making works non-free for the purpose of preserving the intent they >were >created for is useless. People will use other's works as they see fit >anyway. Besides, making them nonfree diminishes the work will do in >favor of the intended objective unless the objective is promoting >non-freedom. > >Stallman uses non-free licenses for a good cause but gets results that >go the other way. Sometimes compromises work in favor of freedom. But >in >this specific case, it does not. > >-- >Saludos libres, > >Quiliro Ordóñez >Presidente (en conjunto con el resto de socios) >Asociación de Software Libre del Ecuador - ASLE >Av de la Prensa N58-219 y Cristóbal Vaca de Castro >Quito, Ecuador >(02)-600 8579 >IRC: >http://webchat.freenode.net?channels=asle&uio=OT10cnVlJjEwPXRydWU3a > >Todo correo que reciba será tratado como información pública, de libre >copia y modificación, sin importar cualquier nota de confidencialidad.
Our teammate Michal Wozniak (a.k.a. Rysiek) just wrote an article about the subject, which I had the pleasure to translate: http://rys.io/en/101 - Carlos Solís
