Dnia niedziela, 19 maja 2013 o 04:39:36 Carlos Solís napisał(a): > "Quiliro Ordóñez" <[email protected]> escribió: > >El 15/05/13 10:16, Will Rico escribió: > >> GNU and FSF promote the use of CC By-ND, so at least by their > >> definition, this license can be considered "free" under the > >> appropriate circumstances: > >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses > > > >Making works non-free for the purpose of preserving the intent they > >were > >created for is useless. People will use other's works as they see fit > >anyway. Besides, making them nonfree diminishes the work will do in > >favor of the intended objective unless the objective is promoting > >non-freedom. > > > >Stallman uses non-free licenses for a good cause but gets results that > >go the other way. Sometimes compromises work in favor of freedom. But > >in > >this specific case, it does not. > > Our teammate Michal Wozniak (a.k.a. Rysiek) just wrote an article about the > subject, which I had the pleasure to translate: > > http://rys.io/en/101
Thanks, Carlos. The article is based in no small part on one of the e-mails I sent here in this topic, and is available also in pure text version: http://rys.io/en/101.txt Carlos' Spanish translation is here: http://rys.io/es/101 http://rys.io/es/101.txt -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
