On 02/11/2016 01:29 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Somebody else may take 90% of the slides and just change 10% of them and > start using them to promote a similar point of view (e.g. Open Source)
If the free software philosophy is indeed the strongest one (and I believe so), then this should not even be a concern but aside from that, those who create derivative works must credit the original authors, so the FSF in this case would get mentioned anyway. > Is the FSF using nonfree licenses as a tactic to prevent that? That would be pretty hypocritical so I doubt it.
