-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/02/16 17:05, Joshua Gay wrote: > Out of curiousity, for those that do strongly believe all works > should be freely licensed, do you believe that GNU GPL, is > therefore itself a work that is an injustice to those who recieve > it and that it should be condemned and avoided? Although it makes no sense to prevent people from using the GPL freely, sharing copies of the GPL freely, modifying the GPL (provided they change the name of course), or sharing copies of their modified GPL, we are talking about cultural works here. The GPL is a hack by many deemed necessary under Anglo-American copyright law; a licence is not a cultural work. - -- Alexander [email protected] https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWvM9EAAoJENQqWdRUGk8Bf8YP/2vBuy7VPv+MNAyJXfssRbLF pNg7O+oGE1vRvspxDvXOWr466c8p8/5ZmmcumcoOmsLVdqW7XPaCL63yBddtCjeK 4EAJQKukBw4OHpaJC79sVjZxR7f3GgW+wpf/dstoeAgfpWQRyYLyEX65iSrtoh91 r1/oU5bkot7C66YRVghpeEBicZ/bQyAobnyorm9fTgzMGKJZJ7g7lXqGW69E9biB NjxrJH8IRGOVneFHrokOKrJAoK9XRjdTyhSeXzbLCZb5FNgFld6Iq2TxiLMDwZXe Wb7Gx2EjiXWEeL7zmyevzAjesVAqhow2htiF2ujlm/y4r3YdYrVxyR45HOrwQS1/ gXfjTfnC+NjFUMwJpJ9MXtr96h00iBW5QUzloC6bbMAZpIU2dtAyTXI3R5wVyI07 HiiQ7xOI1Fr1SYCOifEby1FvRLyNNRNBkBpbfpmkFH5A7ql/n8IXN/m0PAtDxp73 IgwO11qmRG2gsSZeYMGYHTWW84sMOoLYSx+NCz9ChKNC9loYEKxdoLAu1lzV/ahk +uFJxFKdGCT4vVQQ2yAlMRMZzDKzj2V2WeLnNtBWaZ74DV2BGtuDFx+c1fRXTrtC buHw44jzdffTm+uD4Tx7WJNmzbx7TDyl190gHKEb8nmF2+TFXtCjz883xKJ0tMDS SRqRMOb07mlOF2bOUBqf =872l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
