Plse keep  us up on this thread it has huge privacy & ethical
considerations not to mention wellness issues..CLucy restore 4th

On Tuesday, August 16, 2016, Aaron E-J <[email protected]> wrote:

> If an open source device is modified by the end consumer and this consumer
> does not know what they are doing, in the medical field this can have life
> threatening consequences.  People who do not understand what it means for
> something to be open source could take a press release about such a
> scenario and run with it; saying that this is a reason for keeping code a
> secret.  Such a program needs for the devices themselves to be very
> secure and un-hackable, but for the method by which the devices are made
> and the source code to be open.  There is tremendous potential for a
> bridge to be formed between the users of the technologies and their
> development.
>
> I was working on a project to develop an open source electrical muscle
> stimulation device with the initial use going towards the development of a
> gait retraining system.  This is currently on hold, but I would be
> interested in working with other people in starting an open source medical
> device organization geared towards developing new devices and advocating
> for a more libre healthcare system.
>
> You can read more details about the device I was developing on my website:
> otherrealm.org
>
> Let me know if you are interested in such an organization or if you know
> of existing organizations with this focus.
>
> Aaron E-J http://otherrealm.org http://theotherrealm.org (Blog)
> On 2016-08-13 2:24 PM, Marcos Marado wrote:
> > > I won't go as far as to talk about robotic bodies, but the issue is
> pertinent today, with current technology. > > I recently read about a woman
> who has a pacemaker. It had a software bug, which frightened her. She knows
> /of/ it but she doesn't know it, since she doesn't have access to the
> software running on her own body. Furthermore, she found out that there is
> a functionality in it to accept OTA updates, which she cannot control.
> Scary. And this is not science fiction, this is a real case, current
> technology. > > Unfortunately I don't recall where I read about this, but
> it was in the last couple of weeks. On FSFE's newsletter, maybe? > >
> Anyway, the question can be rephrased to "how ethical it is to implant
> non-free software on someone's body?". > > Best regards, > -- > Marcos
> Marado > ANSOL.org > > > On Aug 12, 2016 16:42, "Logan Streondj" <
> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently gave a presentation[1] on my libreware project, and someone
> said they really liked the Golden Rule angle of reincarnating as a robot
> .
>
> The typical example I've often read advocating for libreware is the
> car analogy, where you have access to your cars internals. This was a
> great analogy when cars didn't have loads of proprietary software
> installed -- unfortunately it is only increasing because of
> self-driving cars.
>
> However now as we get closer to the twenty twenties, when the
> processing of a human brain should be affordable for a $1000.
> The analogy I use now is:
>
> "When you reincarnate as a robot, do you want to be enslaved by
> proprietary software and hardware, or be liberated by libre software
> and hardware?"
>
> Anyways wondering what you guys think of this angle,
> and if you might use it also.
> I have more detailed slides in my presentation[1].
>
>
> [1] my presentation SPEL and GI-OS overview (CC-BY-SA): PDF
>  http://wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.pdf
> <http://wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.pdf>
> <http://wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.pdf>
>  source TEX:
> wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.tex
> <http://wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.tex>
> <http://wyn.bot.nu/spel/src/virtual-machine/manual/presentation.tex>
>
> > >     ____ > >     Freeform discussion: irc.gnu.org <http://irc.gnu.org>
> <http://irc.gnu.org> #fsf >     Sharing news and links: #fsfct
> https://microca.st/fsf & https://status.fsf.org/fsf >     How to use this
> list: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Rapid_
> Responders/Workflow <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Rapid_
> Responders/Workflow>
> <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:LibrePlanet_Rapid_Responders/Workflow>
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to