Hi there, I received several opinions and comments and see the best option for me is to seat with a lawyer in person. Institutions resulted to be no so responsive. Somebody can recommend a person? It can be at the Boston area or Spain.
Best, Julian 2017-10-07 20:43 GMT+02:00 Julian Daich <[email protected]>: > 2017-10-06 13:24 GMT+02:00 Thomas Harding <[email protected]>: >> And that's also an ethical problem (how to allow licensing on a registered >> TM/design?). > > By redacting a document. > >> >> So, if you want to protect a design, the best is to use a worldwide gratis >> protection mechanism : copyright. A photography is a bidimentionnal object, >> a sculpture a tridimentionnal one. >> > > A sculpture is an specific object. Non a set of objects derived from a > concept. > > >> So, simply use CC-By-SA licence (not "NC", because that costs to produce and >> distribute physical object) for design, and GPLv3 for technical >> characteristics written as "a program" (or several programs : one per >> function or group of function (as program libraries), and one for the whole >> functions. >> > > CC are not so good because they do not contemplate if patents are involved. > >> Unfortunately, you cannot restrict by linking the two. That restriction >> would be on physical design, so Creative Commons could help by writing a >> licence "Share alike / enforced to Free Software". They own their licences >> :-) > > How can I contact Creative Common for the writing? > > Best, > > Julian >> >> Le 6 octobre 2017 08:12:18 GMT+02:00, Ineiev <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:58:48PM +0200, Julian Daich wrote: >>>> My idea is define a trademark for a physical object( i.e. as Lego did >>>> with their blocks or Coca Cola with their bottle) and license this >>>> trademark using the GPL. Trademarks can only enforce decorative >>>> characteristics of the physical object, so it will possible to choose >>>> a design and materials to distinguish the libre object, enumerate >>>some >>>> functional characteristics to avoid confusions and use both to define >>>> the source. The object will be the physical object itself. >>> >>>I believe trademarks only apply to look, they can't impose any >>>requirements when someone uses your physical object internally >>>and never tells customers it's actually used in their product. >> >> -- >> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma >> brièveté. >> _______________________________________________ >> libreplanet-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
