On 08/28/2018 05:37 AM, bill-auger wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 02:43:06 +0200 Thomas Harding <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Databases are "a set" of informations, and copyright applies on that >> collection as whole, and moreover on its structure. > > if thats true then it is a counter-argument to what the OP was > proposing - that siggest can only work if each individual user who > contributed each bit of data retains copyright on each bit - i dont > thik that is the case for such small bits as "tweets" and "likes" > whatnot - so if the copyright belongs to the collector then the users > have absolutely no grounds to ask them to delete or share any of it > > _______________________________________________ > libreplanet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss >
I'm not taking the time to fully engage on this topic, but note that data / database issues are well-addressed by the dedicated community around Open Knowledge. So, among various interconnected sites: https://opendatacommons.org/ Their license *is* a copyleft GPL analogue for data. https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
