Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 05:28:02 -0500 From: John Musielewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Defecting to Panasonic
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:33:18 -0700, you wrote: > > You know, not everyone has a camera like yours that uses CF. Mine uses >multimedia memory cards. I wish it did use CF, it'd be easier to xfer >pictures. > I also can't throw money at my problem. I will be making money off of >this upgrade. $100 for my toughbook and at least a $300-$400 sale for the 70ct >package I have. All around it'll be a better setup for myself. I may even also >use the money for a better camera for myself as well. > Why fiddle with trying to make this 70ct work? The libretto is just too >proprietary to have to upgrade. Too thin of a HD, too expensive of ram, and >too fragile, and too small of a screen. For some, that's perfect, for me, it's >just too little, even for a 110ct. > > I'm packing my bags and moving. It was a fun ride, I'm glad that a >libretto works for some of you, and I'm glad some of you have a CF camera. >That's very nice of you to mention it, and suggest that i should use one to >make my libretto work properly when DLing pictures. That'll also fix the >paging during wordprocessing and browsing teh web, like checking my email. >Even with an ethernet connection, it's like using a 14.4 modem. And that's >under win95, with no plugins or other programs loaded. I have nothing in my >system tray other than the battery icon, and I know how to edit the RUn and >Load sections of teh registry to keep things like the realnetworks player from >loading. It's still not enough. > I give up as I haven't gotten anything helpful from anyone here about teh >low ram problem, other than what amasses to "why don't you buy a ram upgrade, >or a better libretto?" You know what, I've gotten rid of it, that's my >solution, and gotten a far better laptop, one that's cheap to upgrade. > I could spend $300 and get a libretto that's a little faster, little more >ram, little bigger screen, or make $300 and get a bigger laptop that had far >more ram, bigger HD, way bigger screen, and a faster cpu. > Hmm, I think I'll tell those who think I shoudl put money into this >existing libretto and tell them to shove it. I'm out of the game of spending >money on this horrid thing. I bought a brand new battery, and it's not doing >any good. I haven't even used it other than three times. > > Time to wash my hands of this unit. It's served it's purpose, and now >it's gonna go bye-bye. > Interesting couple messages. So if you refuse to spend the money how did you expect others to help you with your problems? Did you expect someone to send you a ram upgrade out of the goodness of their heart in spite of the fact the person may need it? Or maybe for someone to write a ram doubler program for you? What were you going to do in return? The prices are dropping for the 50/70CT. I'd sell it quick if you want the kind of return you are posting. A complete 70CT system is only worth about 250 now and I find them cheaper than that very frequently. And yours only has 16 meg of ram. I'm waiting until the 70 gets around 150 then I'm going to buy one as a spare and one for parts. Both will have 32 meg of ram. ************************************************************** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **************************************************************
