Re: [Libsecondlife-dev] SecondLife asset security

[John Hurliman]

Jesse Nesbitt wrote:
> Random modification? Yeah right!
> EULA  + Banstick is pretty much all they can do
>
> On 12/21/06, Hugh Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> From recent Linden blogs/press releases, it looks like Linden have decided
>> on the following options:
>> - random modification/deterioration of textures, prims etc by server prior
>> to send to client
>> - eula + banstick
>>
>>
>>
>>     
I think there was some humor in there...
_______________________________________________
Libsecondlife-dev mailing list
Libsecondlife-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/libsecondlife-dev