On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:58:16PM -0400, James Housley wrote: >> On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> In a quick test I noticed that using libssh2 to sftp a file takes >>> more >>> than 20 times longer than using libssh2 to scp the same file from >>> the >>> same server. I haven't done any profiling (well, I tried but the >>> profiling tools on my mac os x laptop consistently crashed! I should >>> check that things are properly installed) but wonder if anyone has a >>> clue why this would be the case. >> >> What version of the library are you working with? There is also many >> changing being done in the version that is in CVS related to blocking >> calls. But this doesn't mean there aren't slowdowns written into the >> code. > > libssh2-0.15-20070426 snapshot.
I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that? Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines" -- Anon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
