On May 1, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0400, James Housley wrote: >> >> On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >> I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking >> work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the >> older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that? > > I am afraid that I have never tried libssh2-0.14, sorry. I'll look if > I get the chance.
That is fine, just curious. Slower is not good, just wonder if it was slow to begin with. How are you doing your test? Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Fortune Not Found: Abort, Retry, Ignore? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
