On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:44:24AM -0400, James Housley wrote: > > On May 1, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0400, James Housley wrote: > >> > >> On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> > >> I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking > >> work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the > >> older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that? > > > > I am afraid that I have never tried libssh2-0.14, sorry. I'll look if > > I get the chance. > > That is fine, just curious. Slower is not good, just wonder if it > was slow to begin with. How are you doing your test?
I started with curl, noticed a significant speed difference with sftp:// and scp:// urls, then, to eliminate curl as a possibility, I modified the examples scp_nonblock and sftp_nonblock to connect to a remote server grab a file from there and write it to stdout. I have been using non-trivial files, between 90 and 700Mb in testing (`cat /dev/urandom > /tmp/TEST` for varying lengths of time). Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
