On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:32:52PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> Perhaps we should just remove it from the public API, bump the soname (due to 
> the removal) and make sure we don't use any alloc for it internally?
> 
> I think that is pretty safe to do, I doubt libssh2 has _that_ many users 
> (especially that use the base64 decoding in libssh2).

Bumping the SONAME is painful for lots of people.  If it's just to remove a
symbol, I would much prefer documenting that the function is broken,
not to be used and subject to future removal, but left alone in the code
until the next unavoidable SONAME bump.

>>> Dan
-- 
http://www.MoveAnnouncer.com              The web change of address service
          Let webmasters know that your web site has moved

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel

Reply via email to