Hello, * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST: > The following patch addresses > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I > added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if > hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This > impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX. > > Patch against HEAD.
This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi). I'm not sure whether it should be backported, probably not. Does the testsuite pass with this? Cheers, Ralf > 2006-05-16 Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh, libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 > (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS, _LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG, _LT_LANG_F77_CONFIG, > _LT_LANG_FC_CONFIG) [ aix4*, aix5*, hpux10*, hpux11* ]: > Introduce a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, which > would ignore hardcode_direct=yes if the result would create a > static library dependency. Static library dependencies are > immune to $shlibpath_var.
