> > >* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST: > > > > > >>The following patch addresses > > >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I > > >>added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if > > >>hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This > > >>impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX.
I think this should be set for OpenBSD as well, no? If I understand this correctly, then this setting will kill off one of the biggest complaints the OpenBSD folks have against Libtool. :-) But say: do we actually know of systems that have hardcode_direct=yes and that cause it to put the path into the DT_RPATH and not just the full path in the DT_NEEDED? If not, we don't need this new flag, and reordering what we like to do in ltmain would be the better solution. Oh well. I put this patch off for a reason: it requires lots of thought... Cheers, Ralf
