On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:17:54PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:11:46PM CEST: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST: > > > > > >>The following patch addresses > > >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I > > >>added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if > > >>hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This > > >>impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX. > > > >This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi). > > > > I'll commit one presently. > > Thanks. It would be great if you could explain that "static library > dependency" does _not_ have to do with static libraries at all -- what > a confusing name IMHO! Maybe we should think of a better one. Is that > what HP-UX is using in their documentation?
I couldn't find a name for this in the HP documentation so I made something up :) However, the output of 'chatr' has 'static' in the type of the DT_NEEDED line so that's where I came up with the name. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
