[ moving from libtool-patches ]
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:12:33PM CEST:
> Prepare for next stable release.
> * libltdl/Makefile.inc (LTDL_VERSION_INFO): Update.
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Bump serial number to account for
> changes since 2.2.4 release.
> * INSTALL, config/config.guess, config/texinfo.tex: Updated
> from canonical source.
> * configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Specify dist-lzma, which
No please don't! Why do we have to force Automake >= 1.10.1
upon people bootstrapping Libtool?
Note that, even without dist-lzma, it works to issue
make dist-lzma
iff you happen to be using new-enough Automake.
> was introduced after automake-1.10 was released.
> (abs_top_srcdir, abs_top_builddir): No need to substitute these
> from configure anymore, since we require automake 1.10.1, which
> does perform the substitutions properly.
Hmm.
> (TIMESTAMP): Normal releases were displaying the long-form
> timestamp. Fix to show the short release timestamp as per
> alpha release numbers.
> * NEWS: Update with missing entries from ChangeLog.
> * HACKING (Release Procedure): We release lzma tarballs now
> but no xdeltas.
> * Makefile.maint: Updated to match Release Procedure
> instructions in HACKING.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- a/clcommit.m4sh
> +++ b/clcommit.m4sh
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ set -e
> fi
> # The funny quoting allows keeping one option per
> # line in $rc_file:
> - eval set dummy $(echo $(cat $rc_file) \${1+\"[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]"})
> + eval set dummy `echo \`cat $rc_file\` \${1+"\$@"}`
Ah, so you found that out yourself already.
> shift
> ;;
> --- a/libltdl/Makefile.inc
> +++ b/libltdl/Makefile.inc
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS += -DLT_CONFIG_H='<$(LT_CONFIG_H)>' \
> -DLTDL -I. -I$(srcdir) -Ilibltdl \
> -I$(srcdir)/libltdl -I$(srcdir)/libltdl/libltdl
> AM_LDFLAGS += -no-undefined
> -LTDL_VERSION_INFO = -version-info 8:2:1
> +LTDL_VERSION_INFO = -version-info 9:0:0
Why? Was there an incompatible change that I missed?
Thanks,
Ralf
