Lionel Debroux wrote: > I guess I need to be educated: how "not constructive" is suggesting > that someone should spend time on activities more productive than > duplicating work already done by someone else in another project ?
Who said anything about duplicating work? That would be a waste of time. Of course everything good gets reused. > working on reviews That's integration. > and new code, And new development. Both are already happening. There hasn't been much activity in libusb.git for a while, but then I did focus on work and even manage to go on vacation for a while. > and doing without posting comments that make > Pete Batard feel like banning him from the libusbx ML] I can't really help what Pete feels like doing or not. If a user runs into some trouble while using either library then I'm not going to avoid communicating about it because it would make Pete uncomfortable. If what I write leads to me being banned from the libusbx mailing list I guess that's pretty sad, but even though I can't post I will of course still follow what goes on. It's not so problematic since I don't have any authority anyway. > It's my opinion, and you have the right to disagree with me ;) The repository history is very low on opinion. Let me know if you do dive into it. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
