Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> wrote: > As I said, I think having libuv 0.12 by then is reasonable.
Glad to know :) > The problem for distributions would come if Node 0.12 is not released > by then. Would you have packages for both 0.10 and 0.12? This shouldn't be a problem, we can ship both versions if there are good reasons to do that, like in this case. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `- | HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
