Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess (and hope) Debian uses proper naming schemes like > they already do for projects such as GnuTLS: libuv-0.10 and > libuv-0.12, or something along those lines.
Correct. (binary) package naming follows library soname, so libuv0.10 and libuv12 according to the status quo (due to .so versioning change in current 0.11 master branch). Ciao, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `- | HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
